Why do we hear rants against pedophiles, but not so much about smokers who are slowly killing their kids with-

smoke around the house, and in their cars? Are we supposed to forgive the latter form of child abuse?Why do we hear rants against pedophiles, but not so much about smokers who are slowly killing their kids with-
The two are slightly different and we have laws prohibiting smoking in cars with children in Toronto.Why do we hear rants against pedophiles, but not so much about smokers who are slowly killing their kids with-
Pedophiles hurt kids. Smoking around kids isn't pleasant or advisable but it is not going to kill them. There have been studies that show that there is a genetic predispostion to cancer and second hand smoke does not have a determining factor in that. Otherwise why is it that every person who was exposed to second hand smoke 20 years ago is not now diagnosed with cancer. Why are their people who have smoked for 50 years disease free. They get both 1st and 2nd hand smoke.
Jive man--100 percent of people who have seen a tree will have a death in their family. This is the same statistic used by anti smoking people---should we ban trees? The statistical evidence of trees being dangerous is far more valid than second hand smoke.
No discernable connection between these two. Another example of OTT anti-smoking hysteria.
they are next.
There is a difference. Sound like the stupidest thing I've heard today.